Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Core] Remove dead PlacementGroupScheduleTable and ResourceUsageBatchTable #45918

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 13, 2024

Conversation

jjyao
Copy link
Collaborator

@jjyao jjyao commented Jun 13, 2024

Why are these changes needed?

Not used in the code.

Related issue number

Checks

  • I've signed off every commit(by using the -s flag, i.e., git commit -s) in this PR.
  • I've run scripts/format.sh to lint the changes in this PR.
  • I've included any doc changes needed for https://docs.ray.io/en/master/.
    • I've added any new APIs to the API Reference. For example, if I added a
      method in Tune, I've added it in doc/source/tune/api/ under the
      corresponding .rst file.
  • I've made sure the tests are passing. Note that there might be a few flaky tests, see the recent failures at https://flakey-tests.ray.io/
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Release tests
    • This PR is not tested :(

Signed-off-by: Jiajun Yao <jeromeyjj@gmail.com>
@jjyao jjyao requested review from a team, ericl, pcmoritz and raulchen as code owners June 13, 2024 05:42
@jjyao jjyao added the go add ONLY when ready to merge, run all tests label Jun 13, 2024
@can-anyscale can-anyscale merged commit 65b7255 into ray-project:master Jun 13, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
@jjyao jjyao deleted the jjyao/red branch June 13, 2024 20:08
saihaj pushed a commit to saihaj/ray that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2024
…Table (ray-project#45918)

Not used in the code.

Signed-off-by: Saihajpreet Singh <c-saihajpreet.singh@anyscale.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
go add ONLY when ready to merge, run all tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants