Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix log and note :cidr mask size must be <= node mask #84637

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2019
Merged

fix log and note :cidr mask size must be <= node mask #84637

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2019

Conversation

zhipengzuo
Copy link

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup
As the code showing :cidr mask size must be <= node mask.The wrong log and note may misleading some people.

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

People can see the right log and note.

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Nov 1, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @zhipengzuo. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. sig/apps Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Apps. sig/network Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Nov 1, 2019
@zhipengzuo
Copy link
Author

/assign @bowei
PTAL,thanks.

aojea
aojea reviewed Nov 1, 2019
View reviewed changes
pkg/controller/nodeipam/node_ipam_controller.go
for _, cidr := range clusterCIDRs {
mask := cidr.Mask
if maskSize, _ := mask.Size(); maskSize > nodeCIDRMaskSize {
klog.Fatal("Controller: Invalid --cluster-cidr, mask size of cluster CIDR must be less than --node-cidr-mask-size")
klog.Fatal("Controller: Invalid --cluster-cidr, mask size of cluster CIDR must be less than or equal to --node-cidr-mask-size")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe the text is right and the comparison is no?
I mean, if both masks are equal you can only have one node, right?
is this expected?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There can be setups that only have a single node for the cluster.

@bowei
Copy link
Member

bowei commented Nov 1, 2019

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Nov 1, 2019
@bowei
Copy link
Member

bowei commented Nov 1, 2019

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 1, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bowei, zhipengzuo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 1, 2019
@aojea
Copy link
Member

aojea commented Nov 1, 2019

@bowei one nit, I think that we should update or remove the release-note block in the description, the current message is not really meaningful and it doesn't seems a big change

@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@k82cn
Copy link
Member

k82cn commented Nov 4, 2019

/kind cleanup
/priority important-soon

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. and removed needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. labels Nov 4, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. label Nov 4, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit b55440d into kubernetes:master Nov 4, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.17 milestone Nov 4, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@bowei bowei bowei left review comments

@aojea aojea aojea left review comments

@aveshagarwal aveshagarwal Awaiting requested review from aveshagarwal

@k82cn k82cn Awaiting requested review from k82cn

Assignees

@bowei bowei

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. sig/apps Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Apps. sig/network Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v1.17
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
6 participants
@zhipengzuo @k8s-ci-robot @bowei @aojea @fejta-bot @k82cn