Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Hyperparameter search: LSTM vs BasicLSTM vs GRU #17

Closed
guilhermevarela opened this issue Sep 28, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Hyperparameter search: LSTM vs BasicLSTM vs GRU #17

guilhermevarela opened this issue Sep 28, 2018 · 1 comment
Assignees
@guilhermevarela
Labels
enhancement

Comments

@guilhermevarela
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@guilhermevarela guilhermevarela self-assigned this Sep 28, 2018
@guilhermevarela guilhermevarela changed the title Hyperparameter search LSTM vs BasicLSTM vs GRU Hyperparameter search: LSTM vs BasicLSTM vs GRU Sep 28, 2018
guilhermevarela added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 28, 2018
@guilhermevarela
issue #17: Hyperparameter search LSTM with peep_holes added
57b2b40
guilhermevarela added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 28, 2018
@guilhermevarela
issue #17: Hyperparameter search LSTM with peep_holes added
2a97102
guilhermevarela added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 28, 2018
@guilhermevarela
issue #17: Hyperparameter search LSTM unit added
9567c85
@guilhermevarela
Copy link
Owner Author

BASIC LSTM -- no peep_holes overperform over other rnns

  1. GLO50: LSTM > BASIC > GRU
    2.WAN100: BASIC > GRU > LSTM
    3.WAN50: BASIC > LSTM > GRU
    4.WRD: BASIC > LSTM > GRU

@guilhermevarela guilhermevarela mentioned this issue Oct 1, 2018
Closed
guilhermevarela added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 1, 2018
@guilhermevarela
issue #14 and issue #17: BasicLSTM > LSTM > GRU
7b317c0
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@guilhermevarela guilhermevarela

Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@guilhermevarela