Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
HBASE-28184 Tailing the WAL is very slow if there are multiple peers (#…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
shahrs87 committed Nov 7, 2023
1 parent 027a119 commit 7af6179
Showing 1 changed file with 21 additions and 11 deletions.
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -460,17 +460,27 @@ private void dequeueCurrentLog() {
* Returns whether the file is opened for writing.
*/
private Pair<WALTailingReader.State, Boolean> readNextEntryAndRecordReaderPosition() {
// we must call this before actually reading from the reader, as this method will acquire the
// rollWriteLock. This is very important, as we will enqueue the new WAL file in postLogRoll,
// and before this happens, we could have already finished closing the previous WAL file. If we
// do not acquire the rollWriteLock and return whether the current file is being written to, we
// may finish reading the previous WAL file and start to read the next one, before it is
// enqueued into the logQueue, thus lead to an empty logQueue and make the shipper think the
// queue is already ended and quit. See HBASE-28114 and related issues for more details.
// in the future, if we want to optimize the logic here, for example, do not call this method
// every time, or do not acquire rollWriteLock in the implementation of this method, we need to
// carefully review the optimized implementation
OptionalLong fileLength = walFileLengthProvider.getLogFileSizeIfBeingWritten(currentPath);
OptionalLong fileLength;
if (logQueue.getQueueSize(walGroupId) > 1) {
// if there are more than one files in queue, although it is possible that we are
// still trying to write the trailer of the file and it is not closed yet, we can
// make sure that we will not write any WAL entries to it any more, so it is safe
// to just let the upper layer try to read the whole file without limit
fileLength = OptionalLong.empty();
} else {
// if there is only one file in queue, check whether it is still being written to
// we must call this before actually reading from the reader, as this method will acquire the
// rollWriteLock. This is very important, as we will enqueue the new WAL file in postLogRoll,
// and before this happens, we could have already finished closing the previous WAL file. If
// we do not acquire the rollWriteLock and return whether the current file is being written
// to, we may finish reading the previous WAL file and start to read the next one, before it
// is enqueued into the logQueue, thus lead to an empty logQueue and make the shipper think
// the queue is already ended and quit. See HBASE-28114 and related issues for more details.
// in the future, if we want to optimize the logic here, for example, do not call this method
// every time, or do not acquire rollWriteLock in the implementation of this method, we need
// to carefully review the optimized implementation
fileLength = walFileLengthProvider.getLogFileSizeIfBeingWritten(currentPath);
}
WALTailingReader.Result readResult = reader.next(fileLength.orElse(-1));
long readerPos = readResult.getEntryEndPos();
Entry readEntry = readResult.getEntry();
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 7af6179

Please sign in to comment.