Microdata to rdf second edition bak #444
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
files which are already done aka "sixed" not commented. files that still need modification are commented out.
* master: Expose the urllib2.urlopen response as response_info in URLInputSource cleanup logging and show logs in interactive mode
The replaced xranges are expected to be quite short anyhow, so not worth the effort to check.
…, ur'' --> r'' handling
…rodata->rdf note (published in December 2014)
joernhees
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 28, 2016
…587, #443, #444, #445 * microdata-to-rdf-third-edition: some whitespace cleanup updated microdata test for #375 wrt. #587 (microdata-rdf 2014) modified microdata test for #375 wrt. isomorphism and better output updated MicrodataParser to reflect that pyMicrodata no longer has vocab expansion and cache args syncing changes from pyMicrodata rev c760db0e77c13c4e80fdef675f3c65497f8d08bf
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
DO NOT MERGE THIS PR!
this is just for comparison with #443 as its tests fail and i'd like to see if that's due to rebasing.