Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update some of the python dependencies #5864

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Jacobh2
Copy link
Contributor

@Jacobh2 Jacobh2 commented Sep 24, 2024

Update some of the python dependencies

Split up #5665 into multiple smaller PRs.

Relevant issues

#5630

Type

🐛 Bug Fix
🧹 Refactoring

Changes

  • Updated requirements.txt by installing pip-tools to let it upgrade dependencies and then format back to existing format of the file. Then picking out only some of the packages for each PR.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 24, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
litellm ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 24, 2024 6:46am

Copy link
Contributor

@ishaan-jaff ishaan-jaff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

1 question

aiohttp==3.10.2 # for network calls
aioboto3==12.3.0 # for async sagemaker calls
tenacity==8.2.3 # for retrying requests, when litellm.num_retries set
pydantic==2.7.1 # proxy + openai req.
jsonschema==4.22.0 # validating json schema
pydantic[email]==2.9.1 # proxy + openai req.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why is this pydantic[email] ? @Jacobh2 ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It came from the pip-tools which I used to actually find the versions which work together, that it wanted to change to this. Are you perhaps doing any Email validation? If not, we can remove it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants