You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi !
I followed the guidelines very well and ran the code on some waymo datasets and was very shocked at the results. For better visualization, I think, exporting to ply is very good. And I see that you have already written this function.
I would like to know, does this function require the incoming models to be trainer.models.values(), and if so, maybe we have to put some getters inside the Gaussian model, such as vanilla, in order to read attributes such as self._means.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, this function requires the input models to be trainer.models.values().
I've implemented some export_gaussians_to_ply functions in both misc.py and some Gaussian model files. These were used when I was debugging the code, and I haven't modified them to export standard .ply yet.
I saw your PR, I'll look into it today, thanks for the contribution!
Hi !
I followed the guidelines very well and ran the code on some waymo datasets and was very shocked at the results. For better visualization, I think, exporting to ply is very good. And I see that you have already written this function.
drivestudio/utils/misc.py
Line 50 in 388642a
I would like to know, does this function require the incoming models to be trainer.models.values(), and if so, maybe we have to put some getters inside the Gaussian model, such as vanilla, in order to read attributes such as self._means.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: