Connexion 2.0 #619
Connexion 2.0 #619
Conversation
…ra (#618) * use external swagger_ui_bundle package, remove vendored files * add swagger-ui-bundle to test requirements
|
Hey @jmcs, do you know if merging from a staging branch like this will squash the commits, and remove the contributor information? If it would be possible to keep big changes as separate commits and contributor info preserved, that would be nice (whenever you are ready to merge). |
|
@dtkav both rebase and squash show the changes as commited by me but authored by you: If you prefer I can create a merge commit instead. |
|
Oh cool, I thought github would just squash everything into a single huge commit and put the committer as the author. I haven't used this flow before - thanks for clarifying! |
…llable-in-definitions
|
I see this as potential blockers: |
Fix new flake8 errors
|
I released |
* Add App(resolver=...) for app-wide default resolver * test api.resolver _is_ resolver
|
I released |
|
IMHO we should call it and do the release now. JWT support is backwards compatible, so it could be in 2.1. |
- update docs to pass swagger_ui in options instead of kwargs
|
👍 |
1 similar comment
|
👍 |
Changes: