Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gh-99845: Change _PyDict_KeysSize() return type to size_t #99848

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 29, 2022
Merged

gh-99845: Change _PyDict_KeysSize() return type to size_t #99848

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 29, 2022

Conversation

vstinner
Copy link
Member

@vstinner vstinner commented Nov 28, 2022

  • Change _PyDict_KeysSize() and shared_keys_usable_size() return type from signed (Py_ssize_t) to unsigned (size_t) type.
  • new_values() argument type is now unsigned (size_t).
  • init_inline_values() now uses size_t rather than int for the 'i' iterator variable.
  • type.sizeof() implementation now uses unsigned (size_t) type.

* Change _PyDict_KeysSize() and shared_keys_usable_size() return type
  from signed (Py_ssize_t) to unsigned (size_t) type.
* new_values() argument type is now unsigned (size_t).
* init_inline_values() now uses size_t rather than int for the 'i'
  iterator variable.
* type.__sizeof__() implementation now uses unsigned (size_t) type.
@vstinner
Copy link
Member Author

cc @methane

@vstinner
Copy link
Member Author

I would prefer to change _PyDict_SizeOf() return type to size_t, but it's not required to fix issue #99845, and it can impact the 3rd party frozendict project which uses it.

@vstinner
Copy link
Member Author

I would prefer to change _PyDict_SizeOf() return type to size_t, but it's not required to fix issue #99845, and it can impact the 3rd party frozendict project which uses it.

Another more radical change is to move the private function to internal C API, and frozendict should call dict.__sizeof__() method instead.

Copy link
Member

@methane methane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The patch looks good to me.

Is Py_ssize_t recommended for container size and size_t recommended for memory size for now?

@vstinner vstinner merged commit 4246fe9 into python:main Nov 29, 2022
@vstinner vstinner deleted the dict_sizeof branch November 29, 2022 11:12
@vstinner
Copy link
Member Author

I was confused by assert(size > 0); is new_values(). I read it as assert(size >= 0);, to reject negative values. So I replaced it with: assert(size >= 1); which is less confusing for me :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants