Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gh-98989: configure: add 3.11 to list of Pythons #98988

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 2, 2022

Conversation

JelleZijlstra
Copy link
Member

@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra commented Nov 2, 2022

@JelleZijlstra
Copy link
Member Author

I'll add an issue and NEWS since the bug went out in 3.12a1 and could affect some users.

Copy link
Member

@gvanrossum gvanrossum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't take my word for it, this is probably up to @tiran or @brettcannon to review.

@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra changed the title configure: add 3.11 to list of Pythons gh-98989: configure: add 3.11 to list of Pythons Nov 2, 2022
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ AC_SUBST([FREEZE_MODULE_DEPS])
AC_SUBST([PYTHON_FOR_BUILD_DEPS])

AC_CHECK_PROGS([PYTHON_FOR_REGEN],
[python$PACKAGE_VERSION python3.10 python3.9 python3.8 python3.7 python3.6 python3 python],
[python$PACKAGE_VERSION python3.11 python3.10 python3.9 python3.8 python3.7 python3.6 python3 python],
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Worth queuing up a couple versions?

@hugovk
Copy link
Member

hugovk commented Nov 2, 2022

Something to add to PEP 101 (Doing Python Releases)?

@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ AC_SUBST([FREEZE_MODULE_DEPS])
AC_SUBST([PYTHON_FOR_BUILD_DEPS])

AC_CHECK_PROGS([PYTHON_FOR_REGEN],
[python$PACKAGE_VERSION python3.10 python3.9 python3.8 python3.7 python3.6 python3 python],
[python$PACKAGE_VERSION python3.11 python3.10 python3.9 python3.8 python3.7 python3.6 python3 python],
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are we allowing python3.8 and lower in the first place if we know that 3.9+ is required?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If 3.9 or higher is required, we should remove the earlier and incompatible versions.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Guido said he wanted to remove the 3.9+ dependency that crept into one of the scripts. Increasing the minimum required version might need more discussion as it could make bootstrapping harder for some.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok sure let's get this in first as this is failing randomly on PRs.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@erlend-aasland any objections to landing this?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nah, good to good for my part :)

@erlend-aasland erlend-aasland self-assigned this Nov 2, 2022
…dB.rst

Co-authored-by: Erlend E. Aasland <erlend.aasland@protonmail.com>
@JelleZijlstra
Copy link
Member Author

Something to add to PEP 101 (Doing Python Releases)?

python/peps#2864

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants