Bump ruff to 0.2.0

[AlexWaygood]

Fix these DeprecationWarnings if you run ruff directly on Lib/test or Tools/clinic (which unfortunately you don't see if you run it via pre-commit, since pre-commit swallows all output from the underlying hook unless the hook returns a non-zero exit code):

warning: The top-level linter settings are deprecated in favour of their counterparts in the `lint` section. Please update the following options in `Lib\test\.ruff.toml`:
  - 'select' -> 'lint.select'

warning: The top-level linter settings are deprecated in favour of their counterparts in the `lint` section. Please update the following options in `Tools\clinic\.ruff.toml`:
  - 'ignore' -> 'lint.ignore'
  - 'select' -> 'lint.select'
  - 'unfixable' -> 'lint.unfixable'

[AlexWaygood]

Tools/clinic/.ruff.toml doesn't exist on the 3.11 branch, but Lib/test/.ruff.toml does, so backporting to 3.11 can't be done automatically :/

I think the 3.12 one should be fine, though 🤞

[hugovk]

Thanks!

[hugovk]

(which unfortunately you don't see if you run it via pre-commit, since pre-commit swallows all output from the underlying hook unless the hook returns a non-zero exit code)

(Or unless you run with the --verbose flag.)

Tools/clinic/.ruff.toml doesn't exist on the 3.11 branch, but Lib/test/.ruff.toml does, so backporting to 3.11 can't be done automatically :/

Sounds like we should add Tools/clinic/.ruff.toml to the 3.11 branch at the same time?

[miss-islington-app]

Thanks @AlexWaygood for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.12.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

[bedevere-app]

GH-114935 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.12 branch.

[AlexWaygood]

Sounds like we should add Tools/clinic/.ruff.toml to the 3.11 branch at the same time?

Hmm maybe... I don't think it'll pass on the 3.11 branch though... But maybe that doesn't matter, since we won't actually run the check in CI?

But it's pretty rare that we'll want to update the .ruff.toml file at the same time as .pre-commit-config.yaml, so this feels like it might be a bit of a "one-off" problem that maybe doesn't need a generalised solution?

[hugovk]

OK, let's skip it for 3.11 :)

[bedevere-app]

GH-115008 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch.