Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gh-107406: Add better struct.Struct repr #107407

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Aug 26, 2023

Conversation

denballakh
Copy link
Contributor

@denballakh denballakh commented Jul 28, 2023

@cpython-cla-bot
Copy link

cpython-cla-bot bot commented Jul 28, 2023

All commit authors signed the Contributor License Agreement.
CLA signed

Modules/_struct.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Modules/_struct.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
…e6sQP.rst

Co-authored-by: sunmy2019 <59365878+sunmy2019@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Member

@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code looks right to me and this is definitely an improvement.

Do we need to be concerned about compatibility? I don't think we guarantee backward compatibility for the repr().

@AA-Turner
Copy link
Member

Should we document the new Struct.__repr__ method in Doc/library/struct.rst?

A

@JelleZijlstra
Copy link
Member

I don't think we need to document the method itself. However, a note in the struct docs with versionchanged 3.13 saying that the repr() is now informative would be good.

@denballakh
Copy link
Contributor Author

denballakh commented Aug 18, 2023

Added note. It now looks like this:
image

UPD: it looks like this:
image

@denballakh
Copy link
Contributor Author

when will it be merged?

@kumaraditya303 kumaraditya303 merged commit e407cea into python:main Aug 26, 2023
22 checks passed
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

There's a new commit after the PR has been approved.

@kumaraditya303, @JelleZijlstra: please review the changes made to this pull request.

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Hi! The buildbot ARM Raspbian 3.x has failed when building commit e407cea.

What do you need to do:

  1. Don't panic.
  2. Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
  3. Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/all/#builders/424/builds/4739) and take a look at the build logs.
  4. Check if the failure is related to this commit (e407cea) or if it is a false positive.
  5. If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.

You can take a look at the buildbot page here:

https://buildbot.python.org/all/#builders/424/builds/4739

Failed tests:

  • test.test_concurrent_futures.test_shutdown

Failed subtests:

  • test_interpreter_shutdown - test.test_concurrent_futures.test_shutdown.ProcessPoolForkserverProcessPoolShutdownTest.test_interpreter_shutdown

Summary of the results of the build (if available):

== Tests result: FAILURE then FAILURE ==

443 tests OK.

10 slowest tests:

  • test_venv: 9 min 9 sec
  • test_largefile: 8 min 35 sec
  • test_peg_generator: 7 min 32 sec
  • test_math: 4 min 32 sec
  • test_logging: 4 min 31 sec
  • test_hashlib: 2 min 11 sec
  • test.test_multiprocessing_spawn.test_processes: 2 min 9 sec
  • test_compileall: 2 min 8 sec
  • test_codecencodings_cn: 2 min 5 sec
  • test_gdb: 1 min 47 sec

1 test failed:
test.test_concurrent_futures.test_shutdown

19 tests skipped:
test.test_asyncio.test_windows_events
test.test_asyncio.test_windows_utils test_devpoll test_idle
test_ioctl test_kqueue test_launcher test_perf_profiler
test_startfile test_tcl test_tkinter test_ttk test_ttk_textonly
test_turtle test_winconsoleio test_winreg test_winsound test_wmi
test_zipfile64

1 re-run test:
test.test_concurrent_futures.test_shutdown

Total duration: 38 min 48 sec

Click to see traceback logs
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/var/lib/buildbot/workers/3.x.gps-raspbian.nondebug/build/Lib/test/test_concurrent_futures/test_shutdown.py", line 49, in test_interpreter_shutdown
    self.assertFalse(err)
AssertionError: b'Exception in thread Thread-1:\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n  File "/var/lib/buildbot/workers/3.x.gps-raspbian.nondebug/build/Lib/threading.py", line 1059, in _bootstrap_inner\n    self.run()\n  File "/var/lib/buildbot/workers/3.x.gps-raspbian.nondebug/build/Lib/concurrent/futures/process.py", line 339, in run\n    self.add_call_item_to_queue()\n  File "/var/lib/buildbot/workers/3.x.gps-raspbian.nondebug/build/Lib/concurrent/futures/process.py", line 394, in add_call_item_to_queue\n    self.call_queue.put(_CallItem(work_id,\n  File "/var/lib/buildbot/workers/3.x.gps-raspbian.nondebug/build/Lib/multiprocessing/queues.py", line 94, in put\n    self._start_thread()\n  File "/var/lib/buildbot/workers/3.x.gps-raspbian.nondebug/build/Lib/multiprocessing/queues.py", line 177, in _start_thread\n    self._thread.start()\n  File "/var/lib/buildbot/workers/3.x.gps-raspbian.nondebug/build/Lib/threading.py", line 978, in start\n    _start_new_thread(self._bootstrap, ())\nRuntimeError: can\'t create new thread at interpreter shutdown\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n  File "/var/lib/buildbot/workers/3.x.gps-raspbian.nondebug/build/Lib/multiprocessing/forkserver.py", line 274, in main\n    code = _serve_one(child_r, fds,\n           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\n  File "/var/lib/buildbot/workers/3.x.gps-raspbian.nondebug/build/Lib/multiprocessing/forkserver.py", line 313, in _serve_one\n    code = spawn._main(child_r, parent_sentinel)\n           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\n  File "/var/lib/buildbot/workers/3.x.gps-raspbian.nondebug/build/Lib/multiprocessing/spawn.py", line 132, in _main\n    self = reduction.pickle.load(from_parent)\n           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\n  File "/var/lib/buildbot/workers/3.x.gps-raspbian.nondebug/build/Lib/multiprocessing/synchronize.py", line 115, in __setstate__\n    self._semlock = _multiprocessing.SemLock._rebuild(*state)\n                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\nFileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory\n' is not false

@denballakh denballakh deleted the add-struct-repr branch August 27, 2023 01:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

better struct.Struct repr
8 participants