You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
You wrote in the accompanying blogpost that you’re limiting the capturing wildcards to 8 so the difference may not be significant. But since the old concat() function remains available, I’m wondering how the two compares in terms of performance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This crate only provides wildcard matching, it doesn't know anything about the rules engine (which concat() is a part of). Also, there's no limits on captures or metacharacters in this crate: that's all enforced by the rules engine.
You wrote in the accompanying blogpost that you’re limiting the capturing wildcards to 8 so the difference may not be significant. But since the old
concat()
function remains available, I’m wondering how the two compares in terms of performance.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: