Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Benchmarks with concat()? #10

Closed
nisbet-hubbard opened this issue Sep 21, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Benchmarks with concat()? #10

nisbet-hubbard opened this issue Sep 21, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@nisbet-hubbard
Copy link

You wrote in the accompanying blogpost that you’re limiting the capturing wildcards to 8 so the difference may not be significant. But since the old concat() function remains available, I’m wondering how the two compares in terms of performance.

@orium
Copy link
Member

orium commented Sep 21, 2024

This crate only provides wildcard matching, it doesn't know anything about the rules engine (which concat() is a part of). Also, there's no limits on captures or metacharacters in this crate: that's all enforced by the rules engine.

@orium orium closed this as completed Sep 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants