Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use bluebird instead of prfun #86

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 4, 2015
Merged

use bluebird instead of prfun #86

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 4, 2015

Conversation

dtinth
Copy link
Member

@dtinth dtinth commented Feb 4, 2015

Bluebird seems to be more well-maintained and more widely used.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.0%) to 98.98% when pulling a0a5ea3 on bluebird into 18265a0 on master.

dtinth added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2015
use bluebird instead of prfun
@dtinth dtinth merged commit 8f91242 into master Feb 4, 2015
@dtinth dtinth deleted the bluebird branch February 11, 2015 04:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants