Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use Repo.anonymize instead of calling an EctoAnon.run function #17

Open
quaresc opened this issue May 16, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Use Repo.anonymize instead of calling an EctoAnon.run function #17

quaresc opened this issue May 16, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
proposal Issues and requests not already approved by the maintainers

Comments

@quaresc
Copy link
Contributor

quaresc commented May 16, 2022

No description provided.

@toommz
Copy link
Contributor

toommz commented May 17, 2022

Won't it be strange that we chose to stop doing some dark magic (introducing an anon_field function used in Ecto's schema definition) but add a function in the Repo?

Sometimes explicit is better than implicit.

@quaresc quaresc added the proposal Issues and requests not already approved by the maintainers label Jun 30, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
proposal Issues and requests not already approved by the maintainers
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@toommz @quaresc