Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conda build #2015

Merged
merged 35 commits into from
Jun 15, 2016
Merged

Conda build #2015

merged 35 commits into from
Jun 15, 2016

Conversation

doutriaux1
Copy link
Contributor

@aashish24 @sankhesh @danlipsa @chaosphere2112 @dnadeau4

This is ready and passes on my computers. But let's carefully review baselines changes at: CDAT/uvcdat-testdata#142

@aashish24
Copy link
Contributor

@doutriaux1 I will have a detailed look at it today.

@sankhesh
Copy link
Contributor

Buildbot dashboard

Gitlab

CDash

@aashish24
Copy link
Contributor

@sankhesh looks like conda is missing on the shell.

@sankhesh
Copy link
Contributor

@aashish24 Yes, it was missing for the earlier builds.

Look at the latest one.

@sankhesh
Copy link
Contributor

@doutriaux1 What is the path to conda on crunchy?

@aashish24
Copy link
Contributor

thanks @sankhesh On karma right? its building now.

@doutriaux1
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sankhesh it should be in my ${HOME}/anaconda2/bin/conda

@chaosphere2112
Copy link
Contributor

@doutriaux1 Building now

@doutriaux1
Copy link
Contributor Author

i merge master in, I'm updating the baselines for you vcsaddons.

@chaosphere2112
Copy link
Contributor

@doutriaux1 @aashish24 Passes tests for me, I'm going to merge.

@chaosphere2112 chaosphere2112 merged commit b403c72 into master Jun 15, 2016
@chaosphere2112 chaosphere2112 deleted the conda_build branch June 15, 2016 15:12
@stefraynaud
Copy link
Contributor

I successfully installed uvcdat using conda on a supercomputer where I haven't been able to do it for years using cmake. So will the conda system be the prefered way to install uvcdat in the future?

@williams13
Copy link
Contributor

Yes.

Best regards,
Dean

From: Stephane Raynaud <notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: UV-CDAT/uvcdat <reply@reply.github.commailto:reply@reply.github.com>
Date: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 at 2:31 AM
To: UV-CDAT/uvcdat <uvcdat@noreply.github.commailto:uvcdat@noreply.github.com>
Subject: Re: [UV-CDAT/uvcdat] Conda build (#2015)

I successfully installed uvcdat using conda on a supercomputer where I haven't been able to do it for years using cmake. So will the conda system be the prefered way to install uvcdat in the future?


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/2015#issuecomment-227691435, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ACrXKT3ZrV07i3SnMpjXrmpb_tuGBeZkks5qOQDWgaJpZM4IyPZ2.

@aashish24
Copy link
Contributor

I successfully installed uvcdat using conda on a supercomputer where I haven't been able to do it for years using cmake. So will the conda system be the prefered way to install uvcdat in the future?

@stefraynaud cheers 🎉 yes, conda is the preferred way for installation for the end-users. Also I would like to point out that conda is a package management system and cmake is the build system. Underneath conda, you are still using make and cmake for individual packages.

I am curious if you were able to use system MPI for your supercomputer?

@aashish24
Copy link
Contributor

I am curious if you were able to use system MPI for your supercomputer?

If not, I am wondering if you can point mpi4py to use system MPI. It should be possible but may require some manual work.

@doutriaux1
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aashish24 mpi4py states:

Install

Once you have a working MPI implementation and the mpicc compiler wrapper is on your search path, you can install this package

so for system mpi you probably will need to install mpi4py in your conda environment after the fact.

@doutriaux1
Copy link
Contributor Author

we will be providing builds against openmpi though.

@aashish24
Copy link
Contributor

@aashish24 mpi4py states:

@doutriaux1 that's what I was thinking too but this would be manual process as I stated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants